Get started

Caution to Lenders: The Effect of Section 8 of the Interest Act on Interest Rates and Mortgage Default Penalties

Real Estate Professionals
Kormans LLP
line
May 1, 2020
Ready to talk?
We’re here to answer all of your questions.
Follow us online
fb-icontwitter-icon

When it comes to an event of mortgage default, Lenders may be surprised to find that Section 8 of the Interest Act prevents them from charging higher rates of interest on default of a mortgage. They may also be surprised to find that the provisions made in their loan agreements for mortgage default penalties, fees, or fines, are rendered unenforceable due to the effect of Section 8 of the Interest Act; that is, if such penalties, fees, or fines have the effect of raising the interest rate of the mortgage on default. This is notwithstanding the prior knowledge of Borrowers of the inclusion of such penalties in their loan agreements, and their execution thereof.

The Courts have, on many occasions, set aside interest rate increases triggered by default, as well as default penalties and late payment charges which did not reflect real costs incurred by the Lender.

In Krayzel Corp. v. Equitable Trust Co., 2016 SCC 18, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) clarified Section 8 of the Interest Act, stating that increases in interest rates that are tied to an event of default are prohibited; however, increases in interest rates due to a passage of time (e.g. loan agreements stipulating an increase in interest rate at a certain known date during the term) are not prohibited. The SCC also clarified that loan agreements which provide for interest rate discounts if the loan is repaid on time are also likely not prohibited by Section 8.

In P.A.R.C.E.L. Inc. v. Acquaviva, 2015 ONCA 331, the Court set aside a number of late payment charges and default fees in its decision, stating that they were prohibited under Section 8 of the Interest Act, because they did not involve “actual losses as a result of late or missed payments under the mortgage”. This means that the Lender has to incur real costs, administrative or otherwise, in its attempt to recover the unpaid debt.

Some important takeaways for Lenders are as follows:

  1. Interest rate increases on a mortgage triggered by default are prohibited;
  2. It is likely that interest rate increases which are stipulated by a certain date, not related to default, are not prohibited;
  3. Default penalties and late payment charges have frequently been disputed by Borrowers, and set aside by Courts. Fees charged must reflect actual losses incurred by the Lender.

For Lenders wishing to minimize the possibility of disputes with their Borrowers, it would be prudent to take heed of the Court decisions surrounding Section 8 of the Interest Act when drafting their mortgage provisions.

kormans-logo
linekormans-logokormans-logo
Kormans LLP
About

Related Services

Related Blog Posts
Real Estate Law
Corporate Law
Before You Sign; Have a Lawyer Review Your Lease
Kormans LLP
In the volatile residential real estate market conditions in Ontario during the past year or so the forfeiture of deposits has become a crucial issue often encountered during  ...
June 4, 2025
Real Estate Law
30-Year Amortization for First Time Home Buyers of New Build Homes
Kormans LLP
In the volatile residential real estate market conditions in Ontario during the past year or so the forfeiture of deposits has become a crucial issue often encountered during  ...
August 8, 2024
Corporate Law
Real Estate Law
The Power of Sale Process in Ontario: Key Information for Borrowers and Lenders
Kormans LLP
In the volatile residential real estate market conditions in Ontario during the past year or so the forfeiture of deposits has become a crucial issue often encountered during  ...
August 1, 2024
Recent Blog Posts
limited liability partnership ontario
Corporate Law
Real Estate Law
The Smarter Way to Practice Together: LLPs in Ontario
M. Wajahat Faizan

Discover how Limited Liability Partnerships (LLPs) in Ontario protect professionals like lawyers, accountants, and architects while allowing collaboration, resource-sharing, and individual liability protection.

September 18, 2025
Real Estate Law
HST Remittance on a Commercial Sale – Part Two
Kormans LLP

In this blog post, we will cover in further detail some of the other key items that are important to consider when accepting HST indemnity from the Buyer for the HST self-remittance.

August 14, 2025
Real Estate Law
Delivery of Deposit Is Not a Cooling-Off Period
Kormans LLP

There is an all-too-common misconception by some Buyers and even by some Buyers’ professional, licenced realtors that the time period for the delivery of a Deposit pursuant to a resale Agreement of Purchase and Sale (APS) effectively provides the Buyer with a cooling-off period. The mistaken belief is that the Buyer has until the time and date specified in the APS for the delivery of the Deposit to have Buyer’s remorse for whatever reason and therefore elect to terminate the APS by not delivering the Deposit.

August 7, 2025
kormans-logo