Get started

Breach of Commercial Lease During COVID-19 Pandemic

No items found.
Kormans LLP
line
April 16, 2020
Ready to talk?
We’re here to answer all of your questions.
Follow us online
fb-icontwitter-icon

The spread of COVID-19 affects the abilities of both the tenant and landlord to fulfill their respective obligations under commercial leases. In particular, if a tenant must close its business at the leased premises because of preventive measures ordered by the government, it may not have enough money to pay its rent to the landlord. Also, failure to operate from the leased premises continuously can be considered as a non-monetary breach of the lease. At the same time, if enough tenants at the landlord's property do not pay their rent, the landlord may become unable to pay its bills for utilities serving the leased property.

If a party expects that it will fail to perform lease covenants, first, a full review of the lease should be performed to determine whether such an inability amounts to a default during a pandemic. If the landlord included a health emergency provision in the lease, such a clause usually deems certain failures to satisfy obligations because of the pandemic, such as failure to maintain and repair, not to be a landlord's default. For the tenant, a force majeure clause may give a tenant some relief for a breach of a non-monetary covenant. However, the force majeure provisions rarely excuse non-payment of rent.

If a tenant cannot pay rent under its lease and the lease does not provide any relief for payment during a pandemic, the tenant should try and negotiate with the landlord for a rent abatement or deferral. Although the landlord does not have an obligation to agree to the tenant's request, it can be a better option for the landlord than to start looking for a new tenant during the pandemic. Any agreement between the landlord and tenant on deferral or reduction of rent should be documented in writing.

Most commercial leases include default provisions describing the landlord's rights and remedies when a tenant default occurs. Usually, before exercising any remedy for a tenant default, the landlord must provide the tenant with prior written notice describing the default (requirement differs for a monetary breach and a non-monetary breach) as well as the cure period to rectify the default.

The Ontario government has halted any new evictions for residential tenancies. However, there has been no express prohibition on evictions for commercial tenancies. If the landlord wants to evict the tenant, the most common way is to deliver a written notice of termination to the tenant and to change the locks at the premises. Another alternative is to apply to the court for a writ of possession. This way is often applicable if physical re-entry is not possible or if there is a question as to whether the landlord is legally allowed to evict a tenant. However, due to the suspension of the Superior Court of Justice regular operations during the pandemic, it can be difficult to obtain a writ of possession promptly.

If you have any legal questions about your commercial lease, please do not hesitate to contact the lawyers of Kormans LLP

kormans-logo
linekormans-logokormans-logo
Kormans LLP
About

Related Services

Related Blog Posts
Real Estate Law
30-Year Amortization for First Time Home Buyers of New Build Homes
Kormans LLP
In the volatile residential real estate market conditions in Ontario during the past year or so the forfeiture of deposits has become a crucial issue often encountered during  ...
August 8, 2024
Corporate Law
Real Estate Law
The Power of Sale Process in Ontario: Key Information for Borrowers and Lenders
Kormans LLP
In the volatile residential real estate market conditions in Ontario during the past year or so the forfeiture of deposits has become a crucial issue often encountered during  ...
August 1, 2024
Corporate Law
Registering Your Non-Ontario Corporation as an Extra-Provincial Corporation in Ontario
Kormans LLP
In the volatile residential real estate market conditions in Ontario during the past year or so the forfeiture of deposits has become a crucial issue often encountered during  ...
February 22, 2024
Recent Blog Posts
limited liability partnership ontario
Corporate Law
Real Estate Law
The Smarter Way to Practice Together: LLPs in Ontario
M. Wajahat Faizan

Discover how Limited Liability Partnerships (LLPs) in Ontario protect professionals like lawyers, accountants, and architects while allowing collaboration, resource-sharing, and individual liability protection.

September 18, 2025
Real Estate Law
HST Remittance on a Commercial Sale – Part Two
Kormans LLP

In this blog post, we will cover in further detail some of the other key items that are important to consider when accepting HST indemnity from the Buyer for the HST self-remittance.

August 14, 2025
Real Estate Law
Delivery of Deposit Is Not a Cooling-Off Period
Kormans LLP

There is an all-too-common misconception by some Buyers and even by some Buyers’ professional, licenced realtors that the time period for the delivery of a Deposit pursuant to a resale Agreement of Purchase and Sale (APS) effectively provides the Buyer with a cooling-off period. The mistaken belief is that the Buyer has until the time and date specified in the APS for the delivery of the Deposit to have Buyer’s remorse for whatever reason and therefore elect to terminate the APS by not delivering the Deposit.

August 7, 2025
kormans-logo