Get started

Latent and Patent Defects of a Property

Buyers
Sellers
Real Estate Professionals
Kormans LLP
line
July 13, 2023
Ready to talk?
We’re here to answer all of your questions.
Follow us online
fb-icontwitter-icon

When  purchasing a resale property in Ontario, it is imperative to be aware of any defects that may be present on the property. Although some defects may be visually obvious, other defects may not be so apparent. These two types of defects are often referred to as either Patent or Latent Defects. In this blog, I hope to explain the difference between the two.

A Latent Defect refers to issues that are not clearly observable upon reasonable inspection and/or walk through of the property. These defects are typically not “in the open” and are concealed, making them challenging for buyers to identify without professional assistance. Common examples of Latent Defects include structural damage, plumbing, or electrical issues. In Ontario, sellers are obligated to disclose known Latent Defects to their perspective buyers. If a seller fails to disclose a Latent Defect, they can be liable for any damages that the buyer may have incurred because of such failure to disclose.

A Patent Defect on the other hand, is a visually observable defect. Such defects are more obvious and would typically be discovered by a buyer without disrupting the property, i.e., a hole in the wall, broken windows, etc.  A seller is not obligated to bring Patent Defects to the attention of a buyer, as the notion of the “caveat emptor- buyers beware” is still prevalent in Ontario. As such, a buyer assumes the risk of a defect that is clear and/or visually observable. It is vital to note that sellers must not take steps to deliberately hide such defects from perspective buyers.

When buyers visit a property, they are considering purchasing, understanding the distinction between these two defects could be essential. By being well-informed about perspective defects, both buyers and sellers can navigate property transactions with greater confidence and transparency. In summary, Latent defects are hidden issues that are not easily visible (requiring disclosure by the seller), while Patent defects are more observable deficiencies. Buyers should always exercise due diligence by conducting adequate inspections and/or seeking professional advice to identify defections on a property. Sellers, too, should fulfill their obligations to avoid legal ramifications and are encouraged to disclose defects to their buyers to maintain an ethical and transparent real estate transaction.

If you have any legal questions regarding the condition of a property you are buying or selling, please do not hesitate to contact us at (905) 270-6660 or e-mail us at: Info@kormans.ca.

kormans-logo
linekormans-logokormans-logo
Kormans LLP
About

Related Services

Related Blog Posts
Real Estate Law
30-Year Amortization for First Time Home Buyers of New Build Homes
Kormans LLP
In the volatile residential real estate market conditions in Ontario during the past year or so the forfeiture of deposits has become a crucial issue often encountered during  ...
August 8, 2024
Corporate Law
Real Estate Law
The Power of Sale Process in Ontario: Key Information for Borrowers and Lenders
Kormans LLP
In the volatile residential real estate market conditions in Ontario during the past year or so the forfeiture of deposits has become a crucial issue often encountered during  ...
August 1, 2024
Corporate Law
Registering Your Non-Ontario Corporation as an Extra-Provincial Corporation in Ontario
Kormans LLP
In the volatile residential real estate market conditions in Ontario during the past year or so the forfeiture of deposits has become a crucial issue often encountered during  ...
February 22, 2024
Recent Blog Posts
limited liability partnership ontario
Corporate Law
Real Estate Law
The Smarter Way to Practice Together: LLPs in Ontario
M. Wajahat Faizan

Discover how Limited Liability Partnerships (LLPs) in Ontario protect professionals like lawyers, accountants, and architects while allowing collaboration, resource-sharing, and individual liability protection.

September 18, 2025
Real Estate Law
HST Remittance on a Commercial Sale – Part Two
Kormans LLP

In this blog post, we will cover in further detail some of the other key items that are important to consider when accepting HST indemnity from the Buyer for the HST self-remittance.

August 14, 2025
Real Estate Law
Delivery of Deposit Is Not a Cooling-Off Period
Kormans LLP

There is an all-too-common misconception by some Buyers and even by some Buyers’ professional, licenced realtors that the time period for the delivery of a Deposit pursuant to a resale Agreement of Purchase and Sale (APS) effectively provides the Buyer with a cooling-off period. The mistaken belief is that the Buyer has until the time and date specified in the APS for the delivery of the Deposit to have Buyer’s remorse for whatever reason and therefore elect to terminate the APS by not delivering the Deposit.

August 7, 2025
kormans-logo