Get started

The Matrimonial Home and Real Estate Transactions

Buyers
Homeowners
Real Estate Professionals
Kormans LLP
line
January 8, 2021
Ready to talk?
We’re here to answer all of your questions.
Follow us online
fb-icontwitter-icon

The matrimonial home is defined in section 18(1) of the Family Law Act (FLA) as “Every property in which a person has an interest and that is or, if the spouses have separated, was at the time of separation ordinarily occupied by the person and his or her spouse as their family residence is their matrimonial home”.

In Ontario, rights relating to the matrimonial home are limited to married spouses. They do not extend to common-law spouses, no matter how long they have been cohabiting together. In order to qualify as a matrimonial home, the property must be located in Ontario and be “ordinarily occupied” by the spouses. This means that the property is used regularly as a family residence or was used as such during the time of separation. According to section 19(1) of the FLA, both spouses have equal rights to possession of the matrimonial home.

It is possible for more than one property owned by one or both spouses to be classified as a matrimonial home. This is often the case when spouses regularly use a vacation home in addition to their primary home.

When it comes to selling or mortgaging a property in Ontario, property owners may be surprised that the consent and signature of a non-titled spouse is required in order to complete the transaction. This is because matrimonial property rights apply notwithstanding that the spouse is on title or not. If the titled spouse attempts to sell the property without the non-titled spouse’s consent, the purchaser may end up obtaining title which is subject to that spouse’s legal interest. Similarly, the non-titled spouse will be required to consent to any mortgage transaction. Likewise, if the consent is not obtained, the lender’s security will be subject to the non-titled spouse’s interest.

The exceptions to the rule regarding spousal consent are threefold and can be found in section 21 of the FLA. The first is that the non-titled spouse releases all their rights to the home under a separation agreement that has been drawn up between the separated spouses. If such an agreement exists, it must be provided to the lawyer who is representing the owner in a sale or mortgage transaction. The second exception involves court authorization of the transaction without spousal consent. Lastly, the third exception involves a property which would under normal circumstances be classified as a matrimonial home, but for the registration by both spouses of a matrimonial home designation on a separate property. To clarify, in Ontario, spouses may choose to formally register a matrimonial designation on the title to a property. This is not necessary in order for a property to be classified as a matrimonial home, however when this is done, it means that no other property owned by one or both of the spouses may be classified as a matrimonial home. As such, spousal consent would not be required for such a property.

Whether you are purchasing, selling, or mortgaging a property, you should advise your lawyer of your spousal status, and the nature of the occupation of the property in question as early as possible, to enable them to determine whether spousal consent will be required in a given transaction.

kormans-logo
linekormans-logokormans-logo
Kormans LLP
About

Related Services

Related Blog Posts
Real Estate Law
30-Year Amortization for First Time Home Buyers of New Build Homes
Kormans LLP
In the volatile residential real estate market conditions in Ontario during the past year or so the forfeiture of deposits has become a crucial issue often encountered during  ...
August 8, 2024
Corporate Law
Real Estate Law
The Power of Sale Process in Ontario: Key Information for Borrowers and Lenders
Kormans LLP
In the volatile residential real estate market conditions in Ontario during the past year or so the forfeiture of deposits has become a crucial issue often encountered during  ...
August 1, 2024
Corporate Law
Registering Your Non-Ontario Corporation as an Extra-Provincial Corporation in Ontario
Kormans LLP
In the volatile residential real estate market conditions in Ontario during the past year or so the forfeiture of deposits has become a crucial issue often encountered during  ...
February 22, 2024
Recent Blog Posts
limited liability partnership ontario
Corporate Law
Real Estate Law
The Smarter Way to Practice Together: LLPs in Ontario
M. Wajahat Faizan

Discover how Limited Liability Partnerships (LLPs) in Ontario protect professionals like lawyers, accountants, and architects while allowing collaboration, resource-sharing, and individual liability protection.

September 18, 2025
Real Estate Law
HST Remittance on a Commercial Sale – Part Two
Kormans LLP

In this blog post, we will cover in further detail some of the other key items that are important to consider when accepting HST indemnity from the Buyer for the HST self-remittance.

August 14, 2025
Real Estate Law
Delivery of Deposit Is Not a Cooling-Off Period
Kormans LLP

There is an all-too-common misconception by some Buyers and even by some Buyers’ professional, licenced realtors that the time period for the delivery of a Deposit pursuant to a resale Agreement of Purchase and Sale (APS) effectively provides the Buyer with a cooling-off period. The mistaken belief is that the Buyer has until the time and date specified in the APS for the delivery of the Deposit to have Buyer’s remorse for whatever reason and therefore elect to terminate the APS by not delivering the Deposit.

August 7, 2025
kormans-logo