Get started

What’s the Difference Between Sharing Ownership of Your Property as Joint Tenants vs Tenants in Common?

Buyers
Real Estate Professionals
Kormans LLP
line
January 30, 2019
Ready to talk?
We’re here to answer all of your questions.
Follow us online
fb-icontwitter-icon

If you’re considering purchasing a property with two or more individuals, you should decide whether you will take ownership as “joint tenants” or as “tenants in common”. These are legal concepts that identify the two different structures of property ownership.

Joint Tenancy

As joint tenants, each owner owns the property wholly, equally and jointly with the other owner(s). If one owner dies, the surviving owner(s) will then own the property by right of survivorship. For example, if A and B are joint tenants and B dies, A will then become the sole owner of the property. Joint tenancy is commonly used by spouses for their matrimonial home as a simple form of estate planning.

Tenancy in Common

As tenants in common, each individual owns a percentage of the ownership and there is no right of survivorship. For example, A owns 40%, B owns 40%, C owns 20%. If A dies, A’s 40% ownership interest becomes an asset of A’s estate. The surviving B and C owners will then need to deal with a new tenant in common (i.e. A’s estate trustee and potentially the beneficiary of A’s estate). This type of ownership may be desired for business partners who are purchasing a property for investment purposes.

There can also be a combination of the two types of ownership, i.e. A owns 98% as a tenant in common and B+C own 2% as a Joint Tenants.

There are a number of issues that may arise between tenants in common. For example, do all owners have the right to use the property? Can a third person who is not an owner live in the property? Is each owner required to a proportionate share of the property taxes, utilities, maintenance, insurance premiums and other carrying costs? Who will make decisions with respect to repairs and maintenance? Can one owner sell his or her factional interest to a third party?  To deal with issues associated with a tenancy in common ownership, each purchaser should consult with their lawyer to negotiate a co-ownership agreement prior to submitting an offer for a purchase.

kormans-logo
linekormans-logokormans-logo
Kormans LLP
About

Related Services

Related Blog Posts
Real Estate Law
30-Year Amortization for First Time Home Buyers of New Build Homes
Kormans LLP
In the volatile residential real estate market conditions in Ontario during the past year or so the forfeiture of deposits has become a crucial issue often encountered during  ...
August 8, 2024
Corporate Law
Real Estate Law
The Power of Sale Process in Ontario: Key Information for Borrowers and Lenders
Kormans LLP
In the volatile residential real estate market conditions in Ontario during the past year or so the forfeiture of deposits has become a crucial issue often encountered during  ...
August 1, 2024
Corporate Law
Registering Your Non-Ontario Corporation as an Extra-Provincial Corporation in Ontario
Kormans LLP
In the volatile residential real estate market conditions in Ontario during the past year or so the forfeiture of deposits has become a crucial issue often encountered during  ...
February 22, 2024
Recent Blog Posts
limited liability partnership ontario
Corporate Law
Real Estate Law
The Smarter Way to Practice Together: LLPs in Ontario
M. Wajahat Faizan

Discover how Limited Liability Partnerships (LLPs) in Ontario protect professionals like lawyers, accountants, and architects while allowing collaboration, resource-sharing, and individual liability protection.

September 18, 2025
Real Estate Law
HST Remittance on a Commercial Sale – Part Two
Kormans LLP

In this blog post, we will cover in further detail some of the other key items that are important to consider when accepting HST indemnity from the Buyer for the HST self-remittance.

August 14, 2025
Real Estate Law
Delivery of Deposit Is Not a Cooling-Off Period
Kormans LLP

There is an all-too-common misconception by some Buyers and even by some Buyers’ professional, licenced realtors that the time period for the delivery of a Deposit pursuant to a resale Agreement of Purchase and Sale (APS) effectively provides the Buyer with a cooling-off period. The mistaken belief is that the Buyer has until the time and date specified in the APS for the delivery of the Deposit to have Buyer’s remorse for whatever reason and therefore elect to terminate the APS by not delivering the Deposit.

August 7, 2025
kormans-logo